Lessons of the Agreed Framework for Using Engagement as a Nonproliferation Tool
نویسنده
چکیده
Curtis H. Martin is Professor of Political Science at Merrimack College in North Andover, Massachusetts. He is co-author of Politics East and West: A Comparison of British and Japanese Political Culture (M.E. Sharpe, 1992) and author of “President Clinton’s Haiti Dilemma” (Pew Case Studies in International Affairs, 1997). LESSONS OF THE AGREED FRAMEWORK FOR USING ENGAGEMENT AS A NONPROLIFERATION TOOL
منابع مشابه
CCollaborative Framework for Decision Making Process of the Water Management (Case Study: Kashafrood Basin)
Sophisticated social- ecology systems, such as those in water management in a basin, are usually dynamic, multidimensional, or multidimensional, requiring serious engagement by multiple actors, and decision making in such systems is always faced with serious problems Kashafrood basin in Khorasan Razavi province is one of the most critical aquifers in the country due to the high population growt...
متن کاملThe System of Engagement in a Sample of Prose Fiction and the News
Emerging within Systemic Linguistics, Appraisal/Evaluation is a framework for analyzing the language of evaluation, providing techniques for the systematic analysis of evaluation and stance as they operate in whole texts and in groupings of texts. There are three systems in the Appraisal framework: Attitude, Engagement, and Graduation. This study sets out to analyze the use of the system of Eng...
متن کاملEmployee Engagement within the NHS: A Cross-Sectional Study
Background Employee engagement is the emotional commitment of the employee towards the organisation. We aimed to analyse baseline work engagement using Utrecht Work Engagement Scale (UWES) at a teaching hospital. Methods We have conducted a cross-sectional study within the National Health Service (NHS) Teaching Hospital in the UK. All participants were working age population from both genders...
متن کاملDelving Into the Details of Evaluating Public Engagement Initiatives; Comment on “Metrics and Evaluation Tools for Patient Engagement in Healthcare Organization- and System-Level Decision-Making: A Systematic Review”
Initiatives to engage the public in health policy decisions have been widely endorsed and used, yet agreed upon methods for systematically evaluating the effectiveness of these initiatives remain to be developed. Dukhanin, Topazian, and DeCamp have thus developed a useful taxonomy of evaluation criteria derived from a systematic review of published evaluation tools that might serve as the basis...
متن کاملAssessment of Public Hospital Governance in Romania: Lessons From 10 Case Studies
Background The Government of Romania commissioned international technical assistance to help unpacking the causes of arrears in selected public hospitals. Emphases were placed on the governance-related determinants of the hospital performance in the context of the Romanian health system. Methods The assessment was structured around a public hospital governance framewor...
متن کامل